wonderful 'parallelism' here. The camera in the photo (man w/ dogs) would seem to yield the roughly the 'same' photograph as the one presented, ie, man w/ dogs. By parallelism (there must be a better word), I mean, we are looking at photograph of someone taking a photograph which could be the 'same' photograph -or- are we photographing ourselves photographing? (yea, I know what you are thinking: what the hell did he drink last night?)....Carl, just wondering, were looking thru a finder or were doing 'stealth' work with the screen?
Lyle, it was a happy crowd, no real need for stealth. Also, the light level was quite low and the GF1/20mm lens combination does not have anti-shake. I certainly wanted the extra steadiness of the normal--to me at least--eye-level shooting position rather than floating the camera out in mid-air to use the LCD.
Don't miss that there's a third camera, in the background, taking a very different picture of the same subject...
2 comments:
wonderful 'parallelism' here. The camera in the photo (man w/ dogs) would seem to yield the roughly the 'same' photograph as the one presented, ie, man w/ dogs. By parallelism (there must be a better word), I mean, we are looking at photograph of someone taking a photograph which could be the 'same' photograph -or- are we photographing ourselves photographing? (yea, I know what you are thinking: what the hell did he drink last night?)....Carl, just wondering, were looking thru a finder or were doing 'stealth' work with the screen?
Lyle, it was a happy crowd, no real need for stealth. Also, the light level was quite low and the GF1/20mm lens combination does not have anti-shake. I certainly wanted the extra steadiness of the normal--to me at least--eye-level shooting position rather than floating the camera out in mid-air to use the LCD.
Don't miss that there's a third camera, in the background, taking a very different picture of the same subject...
Post a Comment